Back to Signals

The Contrarian Case for Irving (Yes, Really)

Irving is one of the most misunderstood cities in North Texas. It's not one suburb—it's several different markets wearing the same city name. And one of them might be interesting.

November 15, 20257 min read

Active Investment Pipeline

Irving, TX

Total

$1.5B

Projects

3

$view_all_irving_projects

Sofee's Take

Irving is absorbing serious capital without the corresponding price appreciation. That's either a warning sign or an opportunity — and the $912M infrastructure plan suggests it's the latter. Perception lags fundamentals here.

See full analysis

I'm going to make an argument that sounds wrong at first: Irving might be underrated.

Not all of Irving. Obviously. Irving is huge and varied, and blanket statements about Irving are almost guaranteed to be wrong somewhere. But specific parts of Irving are absorbing serious capital while trading at prices that don't reflect it.

Let me explain what I mean.

Irving Is a Portfolio, Not a Suburb

Here's the first thing to understand: when someone says "Irving," they could be talking about completely different markets.

Las Colinas is a planned corporate/residential community with high-rises, office parks, Fortune 500 headquarters, and a canal district. It's priced accordingly—this is not "affordable Irving."

Valley Ranch is a master-planned community with good schools, amenities, and suburban feel. Also priced accordingly.

South Irving is older, more affordable, dealing with legacy infrastructure and perception issues.

North Irving (north of 635) is actively transitioning—some parts aging, some parts absorbing capital and changing.

These are not the same market. They don't have the same trajectory. They don't have the same price dynamics. Saying "Irving is underrated" or "Irving is overrated" is like saying "California is expensive"—technically true in aggregate but useless for making decisions.

What the Planning Documents Show

Here's what caught my attention:

~$912 million capital improvement program. That's serious money. Not all of it is equally relevant to homebuyers, but the scale signals intent.

Heavy investment in flood mitigation. This is corrective spending—addressing infrastructure issues that have historically limited some areas. It's not glamorous, but it's the kind of fundamental improvement that changes what's possible in a neighborhood.

Transportation and streetscape upgrades. Targeted improvements in specific corridors, not spread evenly across the city.

Active use of redevelopment tools. Tax increment financing districts, zoning changes, targeted incentives. The city is explicitly trying to unlock value in places that have been discounted for years.

This isn't cosmetic spending. It's structural. The question is whether the market is pricing it in yet.

Want help applying this?

Sofee matches your priorities to the right suburb

Tell us what matters — commute, schools, budget, lifestyle — and we'll show you which North Dallas cities actually fit. No spam, no sales pitch. Just signal.

Take the quiz

Why the Market Hasn't Caught Up

Here's my theory about the Irving perception gap:

Buyers wait for certainty. They want to see:

  • •Flood risk fully addressed (not just planned, but done)
  • •Infrastructure visibly completed (not under construction)
  • •Perception shifts (not just fundamentals, but vibes)

Markets don't price that in early. They price it after the work is obvious. After the construction is done. After the area "feels" different.

That lag is where contrarian upside lives.

If you wait until Irving's transitioning areas are obviously improved, you'll pay prices that reflect the improvement. If you buy during the transition—while it's messy and uncertain—you capture the upside.

That's the trade. Certainty costs more.

The Specific Opportunity

I don't want to be too general here, because Irving is too big for general statements. The specific opportunity, as I see it, is:

Areas north of 635 that are:

  • •In the flood mitigation improvement zone
  • •Receiving transportation and streetscape investment
  • •Not already priced at Las Colinas levels

These areas have historically traded at discounts because of infrastructure concerns, perception issues, and the legacy of being "Irving, not Coppell." Some of those discounts are starting to look unjustified given the capital flowing in.

I'm not going to name specific neighborhoods because these situations are very block-specific, but the pattern is identifiable: look for places where capital is flowing but prices haven't adjusted.

Who Irving Is (and Isn't) For

Not for:

  • •Buyers who want uniformity. Irving has too much variation for a simple story.
  • •People allergic to construction. The transition involves construction.
  • •Anyone expecting instant polish. You're buying a direction, not a destination.
  • •Buyers who prioritize school district brand names. IISD isn't Coppell ISD or GCISD.

Good for:

  • •Long-term holds. The capital story plays out over years, not months.
  • •Buyers who understand transition zones. If you've watched other areas gentrify and wished you'd bought earlier, this is that playbook.
  • •People comfortable trading messiness for upside. The discount reflects the mess. The upside comes when the mess resolves.
  • •Investors and patient owner-occupants. This isn't a flip. It's a thesis.

The Airport Factor

I should mention DFW Airport proximity, because it's relevant:

Irving's positioning—close to the airport, close to Las Colinas corporate jobs, close to major highways—creates underlying demand that doesn't go away. Business travelers, corporate relocators, and airport-adjacent workers need to live somewhere.

This is a structural demand driver that supports floor prices even in weaker markets. It's not exciting, but it's real.

The Honest Assessment

Let me be clear about what I'm NOT saying:

I'm not saying Irving is secretly great everywhere. It's not. Variation is extreme.

I'm not saying you should buy anywhere in Irving. Most of Irving is priced appropriately for what it is.

I'm not saying this is risk-free. Transition plays have execution risk. Capital plans can slip. Perception can lag longer than you expect.

What I AM saying: in specific pockets, Irving is absorbing capital at a rate that prices don't reflect. For buyers who can identify those pockets and hold long enough for the improvement to become obvious, there's potential upside that doesn't exist in suburbs where the good news is already priced in.

The Bottom Line

Irving isn't underrated everywhere. But in specific pockets, it absolutely is.

The work is identifying which pockets, understanding the capital story, and having the patience to hold through the transition. That's not for everyone. But for the right buyer, Irving's contrarian case is worth understanding.

Back to all Signals

More from Sofee Signals

AT&T Is Moving Its Global Headquarters to Plano. Here's What That Means.

Downtown Dallas just lost its most iconic corporate tenant. Plano just became the center of gravity for one of America's largest companies. If you're house-hunting in west Plano, the calculus just changed.

Irving Is Also Voting on DART. The Calculus Is Different.

Same election, different city, different stakes. Irving's transit thesis is more complicated than Plano's — and so is predicting how voters will decide.